![]() ![]() The first four tracks have the names duplicated to the right with medium weight, and the last four with regular weight. In this mockup, I used Helvetica Neue which has 14 styles, to show how the track name would look with a lesser weight. If it’s a font that has several weights, not just regular and bold, something in between those two. So the ideal would be to keep the white font as it is, and use a font weight that is not so bold, but not too light either. But if they make those about 200 RGB for example, then it would look out of place with the rest of the text. Many of the GUI fonts are too bold and RGB 255, 255, 255, so too bright as well.So without spending two hours reading the whole thread again, but rather from memory after reading most of it since I started it the night C13 launched, this is what I can summarize: ![]() So I’ll get it started, and feel free to add thing I will surely miss, and once it’s ready in a few days, then we can submit it as feedback, at least those of us who agree with most items on the list. It seems like the most logical and organized way. I suggest that we make a coherent list, so they know what most people want, and then submit that list as feedback. But if the Steinberg devs try to make any sense of it, they will get confused because it’s all over the place. This thread is now at 331 and each day it keeps growing. Okay Steinberg, you’ve snagged me for another year, so do the right thing now and TURN DOWN THE VOLUME ON THOSE LOUD WHITES! Lots of other stuff to enjoy on the new version, so give it a try - you may be surprised. I’ve resorted to tweaking the colour settings to help with clarity (I normally just work with the vanilla settings) but I guess when the inevitable maintenance update comes along I’ll be able to revert back. I’d also prefer losing the Caps on the buttons, but with my failing eyesight, the track names just appear as a complete jumble of letters. However, the Project Window white text ABSOLUTELY HAS to be toned down. And you know what … I really do like the new mixing window! Yes, it could be improved, but there is more to like than not, including the flat faders et al. So rather than pay three times the price of the C13 upgrade for S1 crossgrade I jumped in with both feet for C13. Very nice UI, if a bit garish on the demo projects, but straight away it was clear that I couldn’t see myself losing 10 years of acquired CB knowledge and the inevitable drop in productivity while re-learning something so fundamental to my work. After all the bellyaching in this thread (Including mine!) about accessibility issues I thought I’d try the suggestion that has been bandied around of Studio One, and downloaded the trial. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |